Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. TTWO Peers
See (TTWO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electronic Gaming & Multimedia Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTWO | $232.61 | +0.68% | 41.3B | -9.09 | -$25.58 | N/A |
| NTES | $127.02 | -1.25% | 80.8B | 18.22 | $6.97 | +2.18% |
| ATVI | $94.42 | -0.05% | 74.3B | 34.59 | $2.73 | N/A |
| RBLX | $95.81 | +1.70% | 65B | -72.03 | -$1.33 | N/A |
| EA | $149.57 | +1.14% | 37.5B | 35.28 | $4.24 | +0.51% |
| DDI | $10.44 | +0.38% | 10.3B | 4.41 | $2.37 | N/A |
| BILI | $18.75 | +1.46% | 7.7B | -93.75 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| PLTK | $4.89 | +0.20% | 1.8B | 12.87 | $0.38 | +8.21% |
| AVID | $27.05 | +0.02% | 1.2B | 37.56 | $0.72 | N/A |
| SCPL | $22.95 | +0.02% | 495.6M | 23.18 | $0.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TTWO vs NTES Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, NTES has a market cap of 80.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while NTES trades at $127.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas NTES's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to NTES's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO and NTES have similar daily volatility (1.60).
TTWO vs ATVI Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, ATVI has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while ATVI trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas ATVI's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to ATVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to ATVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs RBLX Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, RBLX has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while RBLX trades at $95.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas RBLX's P/E ratio is -72.03. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to RBLX's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to RBLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs EA Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, EA has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while EA trades at $149.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas EA's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to EA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to EA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs DDI Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, DDI has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while DDI trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas DDI's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to DDI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to DDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs BILI Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, BILI has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while BILI trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas BILI's P/E ratio is -93.75. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to BILI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to BILI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs PLTK Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, PLTK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while PLTK trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas PLTK's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to PLTK's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to PLTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs AVID Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, AVID has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while AVID trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas AVID's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to AVID's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to AVID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs SCPL Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, SCPL has a market cap of 495.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while SCPL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas SCPL's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SCPL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GRVY Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GRVY has a market cap of 437.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GRVY trades at $62.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GRVY's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GRVY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to GRVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GDEV Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GDEV has a market cap of 387.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GDEV trades at $21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GDEV's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GDEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs SOHU Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, SOHU has a market cap of 316M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while SOHU trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas SOHU's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SOHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to SOHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GCL Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GCL has a market cap of 309.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GCL trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GCL's P/E ratio is -245.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GCL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GMGI Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GMGI has a market cap of 267.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GMGI trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GMGI's P/E ratio is -193.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GMGI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs MYPS Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, MYPS has a market cap of 183.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while MYPS trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas MYPS's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to MYPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to MYPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs MYPSW Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, MYPSW has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while MYPSW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas MYPSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to MYPSW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to MYPSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs SKLZ Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, SKLZ has a market cap of 113.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while SKLZ trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas SKLZ's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SKLZ's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SKLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs BRAG Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, BRAG has a market cap of 104.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while BRAG trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas BRAG's P/E ratio is -14.93. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to BRAG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to BRAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GMHS Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GMHS has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GMHS trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GMHS's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GMHS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs NCTY Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, NCTY has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while NCTY trades at $9.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas NCTY's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to NCTY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to NCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GDC Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GDC has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GDC trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GDC's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GDC's ROE of -5.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs SNAL Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, SNAL has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while SNAL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas SNAL's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SNAL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to SNAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GAME Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GAME has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GAME trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GAME's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GAME's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GIGM Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GIGM has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GIGM trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GIGM's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GIGM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GIGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs MSGM Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, MSGM has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while MSGM trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas MSGM's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to MSGM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to MSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GXAI Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GXAI has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GXAI trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GXAI's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GXAI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GXAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs TRUG Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, TRUG has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while TRUG trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas TRUG's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to TRUG's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to TRUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs BHAT Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, BHAT has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while BHAT trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas BHAT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to BHAT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to BHAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs TBH Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, TBH has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while TBH trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas TBH's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to TBH's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to TBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs MGAM Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, MGAM has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while MGAM trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas MGAM's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to MGAM's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to MGAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs NFTG Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, NFTG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while NFTG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas NFTG's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to NFTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to NFTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GCLWW Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GCLWW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GCLWW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GCLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GCLWW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GCLWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GDEVW Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GDEVW has a market cap of 453.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GDEVW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GDEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GDEVW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to GDEVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs GGL Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, GGL has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while GGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas GGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to GGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TTWO has daily volatility of 1.60 and GGL has daily volatility of N/A.
TTWO vs ZNGA Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, ZNGA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while ZNGA trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas ZNGA's P/E ratio is -98.55. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to ZNGA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to ZNGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs YVR Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, YVR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while YVR trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas YVR's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to YVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to YVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs SCR Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, SCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while SCR trades at $35.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas SCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to SCR's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is more volatile compared to SCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.
TTWO vs CCNC Comparison
TTWO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTWO stands at 41.3B. In comparison, CCNC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TTWO is priced at $232.61, while CCNC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTWO currently has a P/E ratio of -9.09, whereas CCNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTWO's ROE is -0.91%, compared to CCNC's ROE of -4.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTWO is less volatile compared to CCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTWO.