Hostess Brands, Inc.
Hostess Brands, Inc. (TWNK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TWNK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWNK | $33.30 | -0.15% | 4.4B | 26.64 | $1.25 | N/A |
| KHC | $28.78 | -0.55% | 34.1B | 13.14 | $2.19 | +5.56% |
| GIS | $50.95 | -0.62% | 27.7B | 12.43 | $4.10 | +4.73% |
| MKC-V | $71.64 | -1.01% | 19.2B | 24.96 | $2.87 | +2.48% |
| MKC | $71.45 | -1.33% | 19.2B | 24.90 | $2.87 | +2.48% |
| HRL | $29.30 | -0.75% | 16.1B | 21.55 | $1.36 | +3.93% |
| SJM | $108.64 | -0.44% | 11.6B | -9.39 | -$11.57 | +3.98% |
| PPC | $47.29 | -1.62% | 11.2B | 9.31 | $5.08 | +13.31% |
| CPB | $32.76 | -1.65% | 9.8B | 21.84 | $1.50 | +4.69% |
| CAG | $19.30 | -1.68% | 9.2B | 8.05 | $2.40 | +7.23% |
Stock Comparison
TWNK vs KHC Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KHC has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while KHC trades at $28.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas KHC's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to KHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check KHC's competition here
TWNK vs GIS Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, GIS has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while GIS trades at $50.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas GIS's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to GIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check GIS's competition here
TWNK vs MKC-V Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MKC-V has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while MKC-V trades at $71.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MKC-V's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKC-V's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to MKC-V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check MKC-V's competition here
TWNK vs MKC Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MKC has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while MKC trades at $71.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MKC's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MKC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to MKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check MKC's competition here
TWNK vs HRL Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HRL has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while HRL trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas HRL's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to HRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check HRL's competition here
TWNK vs SJM Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SJM has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while SJM trades at $108.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SJM's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SJM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to SJM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check SJM's competition here
TWNK vs PPC Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PPC has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while PPC trades at $47.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PPC's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to PPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check PPC's competition here
TWNK vs CPB Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CPB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while CPB trades at $32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas CPB's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to CPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check CPB's competition here
TWNK vs CAG Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CAG has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while CAG trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas CAG's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to CAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check CAG's competition here
TWNK vs INGR Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, INGR has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while INGR trades at $132.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas INGR's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INGR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to INGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check INGR's competition here
TWNK vs LW Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LW has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while LW trades at $58.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas LW's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to LW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check LW's competition here
TWNK vs BRBR Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BRBR has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BRBR trades at $53.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BRBR's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRBR's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BRBR's competition here
TWNK vs BRFS Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BRFS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BRFS trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BRFS's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRFS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BRFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BRFS's competition here
TWNK vs POST Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, POST has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while POST trades at $107.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas POST's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POST's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to POST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check POST's competition here
TWNK vs DAR Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DAR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while DAR trades at $35.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas DAR's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DAR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to DAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check DAR's competition here
TWNK vs LANC Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LANC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while LANC trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas LANC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LANC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to LANC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check LANC's competition here
TWNK vs TWNKW Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TWNKW has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while TWNKW trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas TWNKW's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWNKW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to TWNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check TWNKW's competition here
TWNK vs FRPT Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FRPT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while FRPT trades at $71.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas FRPT's P/E ratio is 239.07. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FRPT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to FRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check FRPT's competition here
TWNK vs FLO Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FLO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while FLO trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas FLO's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to FLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check FLO's competition here
TWNK vs SMPL Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SMPL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while SMPL trades at $32.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SMPL's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMPL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to SMPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check SMPL's competition here
TWNK vs NOMD Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NOMD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while NOMD trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NOMD's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NOMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to NOMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check NOMD's competition here
TWNK vs CENTA Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CENTA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while CENTA trades at $36.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas CENTA's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CENTA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to CENTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check CENTA's competition here
TWNK vs CENT Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CENT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while CENT trades at $40.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas CENT's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CENT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to CENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check CENT's competition here
TWNK vs SOVO Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SOVO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while SOVO trades at $22.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SOVO's P/E ratio is 79.24. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOVO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is more volatile compared to SOVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check SOVO's competition here
TWNK vs JJSF Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, JJSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while JJSF trades at $117.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas JJSF's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JJSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to JJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check JJSF's competition here
TWNK vs KLG Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, KLG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while KLG trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas KLG's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KLG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to KLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check KLG's competition here
TWNK vs UTZ Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, UTZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while UTZ trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas UTZ's P/E ratio is 43.80. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UTZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to UTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check UTZ's competition here
TWNK vs THS Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, THS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while THS trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas THS's P/E ratio is 212.00. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to THS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check THS's competition here
TWNK vs HLF Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while HLF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas HLF's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to HLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check HLF's competition here
TWNK vs JBSS Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, JBSS has a market cap of 807.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while JBSS trades at $68.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas JBSS's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JBSS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to JBSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check JBSS's competition here
TWNK vs STKL Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, STKL has a market cap of 771.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while STKL trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas STKL's P/E ratio is -72.89. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STKL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to STKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check STKL's competition here
TWNK vs SENEB Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SENEB has a market cap of 729M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while SENEB trades at $103.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SENEB's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SENEB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is more volatile compared to SENEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check SENEB's competition here
TWNK vs SENEA Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SENEA has a market cap of 703.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while SENEA trades at $102.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SENEA's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SENEA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to SENEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check SENEA's competition here
TWNK vs WEST Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WEST has a market cap of 659.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while WEST trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas WEST's P/E ratio is -7.66. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEST's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to WEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check WEST's competition here
TWNK vs USNA Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, USNA has a market cap of 598.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while USNA trades at $32.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas USNA's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USNA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to USNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check USNA's competition here
TWNK vs THRN Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, THRN has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while THRN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas THRN's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THRN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is more volatile compared to THRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check THRN's competition here
TWNK vs BRCC Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BRCC has a market cap of 403.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BRCC trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BRCC's P/E ratio is -21.11. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRCC's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BRCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BRCC's competition here
TWNK vs LWAY Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LWAY has a market cap of 394.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while LWAY trades at $25.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas LWAY's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to LWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check LWAY's competition here
TWNK vs BGS Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BGS has a market cap of 353.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BGS trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BGS's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BGS's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BGS's competition here
TWNK vs MAMA Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MAMA has a market cap of 343.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while MAMA trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MAMA's P/E ratio is 83.14. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAMA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to MAMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check MAMA's competition here
TWNK vs BYND Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BYND has a market cap of 294.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BYND trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BYND's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BYND's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BYND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BYND's competition here
TWNK vs NATR Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NATR has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while NATR trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NATR's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NATR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to NATR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check NATR's competition here
TWNK vs FREE Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FREE has a market cap of 211.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while FREE trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas FREE's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FREE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is more volatile compared to FREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check FREE's competition here
TWNK vs LFVN Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LFVN has a market cap of 176.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while LFVN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas LFVN's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFVN's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to LFVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check LFVN's competition here
TWNK vs HAIN Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HAIN has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while HAIN trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas HAIN's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAIN's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to HAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check HAIN's competition here
TWNK vs WESTW Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WESTW has a market cap of 168.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while WESTW trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas WESTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WESTW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to WESTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check WESTW's competition here
TWNK vs MMMB Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MMMB has a market cap of 136.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while MMMB trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MMMB's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMMB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to MMMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check MMMB's competition here
TWNK vs FTLF Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FTLF has a market cap of 124.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while FTLF trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas FTLF's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FTLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to FTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check FTLF's competition here
TWNK vs ABVEW Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ABVEW has a market cap of 116.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while ABVEW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas ABVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABVEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to ABVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check ABVEW's competition here
TWNK vs PLIN Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PLIN has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while PLIN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PLIN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLIN's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to PLIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check PLIN's competition here
TWNK vs ABVE Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ABVE has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while ABVE trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas ABVE's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABVE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to ABVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check ABVE's competition here
TWNK vs LSF Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, LSF has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while LSF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas LSF's P/E ratio is -82.00. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to LSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check LSF's competition here
TWNK vs BRID Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BRID has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BRID trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BRID's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRID's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BRID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BRID's competition here
TWNK vs ATPC Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ATPC has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while ATPC trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas ATPC's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ATPC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to ATPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check ATPC's competition here
TWNK vs BRLS Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BRLS has a market cap of 65M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BRLS trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BRLS's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRLS's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BRLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BRLS's competition here
TWNK vs PAVS Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PAVS has a market cap of 62.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while PAVS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PAVS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PAVS's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to PAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check PAVS's competition here
TWNK vs WYHG Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, WYHG has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while WYHG trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas WYHG's P/E ratio is 6.47. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WYHG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to WYHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check WYHG's competition here
TWNK vs MITC Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, MITC has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while MITC trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas MITC's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITC's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to MITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check MITC's competition here
TWNK vs FARM Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FARM has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while FARM trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas FARM's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FARM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to FARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check FARM's competition here
TWNK vs CLXT Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CLXT has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while CLXT trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas CLXT's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLXT's ROE of -3.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to CLXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check CLXT's competition here
TWNK vs HAPP Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HAPP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while HAPP trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas HAPP's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAPP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to HAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check HAPP's competition here
TWNK vs BTOG Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BTOG has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BTOG trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BTOG's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTOG's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BTOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BTOG's competition here
TWNK vs JVA Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, JVA has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while JVA trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas JVA's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JVA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to JVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check JVA's competition here
TWNK vs YGF Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, YGF has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while YGF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas YGF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YGF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is more volatile compared to YGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check YGF's competition here
TWNK vs BOF Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BOF has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BOF trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BOF's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BOF's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BOF's competition here
TWNK vs NAII Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NAII has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while NAII trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NAII's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAII's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to NAII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check NAII's competition here
TWNK vs NCRA Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NCRA has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while NCRA trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NCRA's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NCRA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to NCRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check NCRA's competition here
TWNK vs SOWG Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SOWG has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while SOWG trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SOWG's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOWG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to SOWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check SOWG's competition here
TWNK vs DDC Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DDC has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while DDC trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas DDC's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DDC's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to DDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check DDC's competition here
TWNK vs COOT Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, COOT has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while COOT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas COOT's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to COOT's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to COOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check COOT's competition here
TWNK vs TTCF Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, TTCF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while TTCF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas TTCF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTCF's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to TTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check TTCF's competition here
TWNK vs PLAG Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while PLAG trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PLAG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check PLAG's competition here
TWNK vs RGF Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RGF has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while RGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas RGF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to RGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check RGF's competition here
TWNK vs PETZ Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, PETZ has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while PETZ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas PETZ's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PETZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to PETZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check PETZ's competition here
TWNK vs BON Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BON has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BON trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BON's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BON's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BON's competition here
TWNK vs IMG Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, IMG has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while IMG trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas IMG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IMG's ROE of -72.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to IMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check IMG's competition here
TWNK vs NUZE Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, NUZE has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while NUZE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas NUZE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NUZE's ROE of -70.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to NUZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check NUZE's competition here
TWNK vs HCWC Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, HCWC has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while HCWC trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas HCWC's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCWC's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to HCWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check HCWC's competition here
TWNK vs BTTR Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BTTR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BTTR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BTTR's P/E ratio is -21.20. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTTR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BTTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BTTR's competition here
TWNK vs ORIS Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, ORIS has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while ORIS trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas ORIS's P/E ratio is 1.23. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORIS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to ORIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check ORIS's competition here
TWNK vs FREEW Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FREEW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while FREEW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas FREEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FREEW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to FREEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check FREEW's competition here
TWNK vs CYAN Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, CYAN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while CYAN trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas CYAN's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYAN's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to CYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check CYAN's competition here
TWNK vs FAMI Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, FAMI has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while FAMI trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas FAMI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FAMI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to FAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check FAMI's competition here
TWNK vs BRLSW Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BRLSW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BRLSW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BRLSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRLSW's ROE of -8.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is more volatile compared to BRLSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BRLSW's competition here
TWNK vs STKH Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, STKH has a market cap of 877.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while STKH trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas STKH's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STKH's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to STKH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check STKH's competition here
TWNK vs BSFC Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BSFC has a market cap of 760.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BSFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BSFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BSFC's ROE of -4.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BSFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BSFC's competition here
TWNK vs SNAX Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SNAX has a market cap of 605K. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while SNAX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SNAX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is more volatile compared to SNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check SNAX's competition here
TWNK vs SMFL Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SMFL has a market cap of 283.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while SMFL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SMFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMFL's ROE of +5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to SMFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check SMFL's competition here
TWNK vs SNAXW Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SNAXW has a market cap of 13.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while SNAXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SNAXW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNAXW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is more volatile compared to SNAXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check SNAXW's competition here
TWNK vs RIBT Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, RIBT has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while RIBT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas RIBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIBT's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is more volatile compared to RIBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check RIBT's competition here
TWNK vs BRCN Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, BRCN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while BRCN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas BRCN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to BRCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check BRCN's competition here
TWNK vs DTEA Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, DTEA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while DTEA trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas DTEA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTEA's ROE of +9.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to DTEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check DTEA's competition here
TWNK vs VGFC Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, VGFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while VGFC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas VGFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VGFC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to VGFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check VGFC's competition here
TWNK vs SAFM Comparison July 2025
TWNK plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWNK stands at 4.4B. In comparison, SAFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TWNK is priced at $33.30, while SAFM trades at $204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWNK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.64, whereas SAFM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, TWNK's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAFM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TWNK is less volatile compared to SAFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWNK.Check SAFM's competition here