Texas Instruments Incorporated
Texas Instruments Incorporated TXN Peers
See (TXN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXN | $188.08 | +2.10% | 170.9B | 35.62 | $5.28 | +2.87% |
| NVDA | $141.25 | +2.82% | 3.4T | 45.71 | $3.09 | +0.03% |
| AVGO | $256.85 | +3.27% | 1.2T | 119.47 | $2.15 | +0.88% |
| TSM | $197.57 | +1.40% | 1T | 23.72 | $8.33 | +1.25% |
| ASML | $747.12 | +0.08% | 293.8B | 30.09 | $24.83 | +0.90% |
| AMD | $117.29 | +2.32% | 190.2B | 85.61 | $1.37 | N/A |
| QCOM | $148.90 | +1.55% | 163.5B | 15.19 | $9.80 | +1.72% |
| ARM | $128.76 | +2.15% | 136.1B | 171.68 | $0.75 | N/A |
| AMAT | $161.72 | +2.83% | 129.8B | 19.70 | $8.21 | +1.03% |
| MU | $102.24 | +4.14% | 114.3B | 24.46 | $4.18 | +0.45% |
Stock Comparison
TXN vs NVDA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while NVDA trades at $141.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AVGO Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while AVGO trades at $256.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 119.47. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs TSM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while TSM trades at $197.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ASML Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 293.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ASML trades at $747.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 30.09. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AMD Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 190.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while AMD trades at $117.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 85.61. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs QCOM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 163.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while QCOM trades at $148.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ARM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ARM trades at $128.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 171.68. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AMAT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while AMAT trades at $161.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MU Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 114.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while MU trades at $102.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ADI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ADI trades at $218.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 59.36. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs LRCX Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 107B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while LRCX trades at $83.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs KLAC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while KLAC trades at $775.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs INTC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while INTC trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MRVL Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while MRVL trades at $62.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -109.40. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs NXPI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while NXPI trades at $198.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MCHP Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while MCHP trades at $63.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6384.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MPWR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while MPWR trades at $685.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs STM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while STM trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ASX Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ASX trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs GFS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while GFS trades at $36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -108.40. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ON Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ON trades at $47.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs UMC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while UMC trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ALAB Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ALAB trades at $95.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 72.54. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs TER Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while TER trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ENTG Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ENTG trades at $71.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SWKS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while SWKS trades at $71.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 27.75. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs CREE Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MTSI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while MTSI trades at $126.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -106.61. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs BRKS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs QRVO Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while QRVO trades at $79.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 136.66. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs OLED Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while OLED trades at $150.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs LSCC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while LSCC trades at $46.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 125.68. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs NVMI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while NVMI trades at $209.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs RMBS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while RMBS trades at $56.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs CRUS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while CRUS trades at $100.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ALGM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ALGM trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -68.67. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SITM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while SITM trades at $205.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -54.08. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ONTO Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ONTO trades at $95.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AMKR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while AMKR trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs TSEM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while TSEM trades at $40.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SLAB Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while SLAB trades at $125.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -24.52. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SMTC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while SMTC trades at $38.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -22.68. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -15.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs CAMT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while CAMT trades at $68.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs IPGP Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while IPGP trades at $68.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs POWI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while POWI trades at $50.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 79.56. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs FORM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while FORM trades at $31.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SYNA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while SYNA trades at $62.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AMBA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while AMBA trades at $53.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -21.63. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs DIOD Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while DIOD trades at $46.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 84.80. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs VSH Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while VSH trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -30.78. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ACLS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ACLS trades at $59.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs KLIC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while KLIC trades at $32.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 89.11. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ACMR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ACMR trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs VECO Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while VECO trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs NVTS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while NVTS trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs PLAB Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while PLAB trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SGH Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MXL Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while MXL trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AAOI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 940.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while AAOI trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs UCTT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 929.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while UCTT trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs DQ Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 904.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while DQ trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs COHU Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 838.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while COHU trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs LASR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 807.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while LASR trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs HIMX Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 734.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while HIMX trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AOSL Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 683M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while AOSL trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -29.81. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs IMOS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 679.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while IMOS trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ICHR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 593.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ICHR trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -37.02. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SIMO Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while SIMO trades at $64.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs INDI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 522.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while INDI trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs CEVA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 472.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while CEVA trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 219.67. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SKYT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 427.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while SKYT trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -52.38. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs LAES Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while LAES trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs POET Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 370.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while POET trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to POET's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs XPER Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while XPER trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs NVEC Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 347.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while NVEC trades at $71.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AIP Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 333.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while AIP trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs TGAN Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AEHR Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while AEHR trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AEHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ALMU Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 301.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ALMU trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -73.46. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs VLN-WT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 236.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while VLN-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs VLN Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while VLN trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs BZAI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 218.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while BZAI trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs WOLF Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 216.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while WOLF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ATOM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 192.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ATOM trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs OIIM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MX Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while MX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MRAM Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 129.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while MRAM trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 143.75. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs QUIK Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while QUIK trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs GSIT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while GSIT trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs INTT Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while INTT trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -636.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs AXTI Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while AXTI trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MOSY Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs NA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while NA trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs WISA Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WISA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ICG Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ICG trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs ASYS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while ASYS trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs GCTS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while GCTS trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs SQNS Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, SQNS has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while SQNS trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas SQNS's P/E ratio is 0.81. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SQNS's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to SQNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.
TXN vs MOBX Comparison
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 170.9B. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $188.08, while MOBX trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.62, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.