Texas Instruments Incorporated
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TXN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXN | $185.69 | -0.30% | 168.7B | 35.24 | $5.27 | +2.89% |
| NVDA | $173.74 | +1.73% | 4.2T | 55.88 | $3.11 | +0.02% |
| AVGO | $288.71 | +1.77% | 1.4T | 104.99 | $2.75 | +0.80% |
| TSM | $241.60 | +0.53% | 1.3T | 28.39 | $8.51 | +1.08% |
| ASML | $725.08 | +1.14% | 285.1B | 25.80 | $28.10 | +0.91% |
| AMD | $162.12 | +2.19% | 262.9B | 117.48 | $1.38 | N/A |
| QCOM | $158.84 | -0.65% | 174.4B | 16.21 | $9.80 | +2.17% |
| ARM | $159.99 | +0.45% | 169.1B | 213.32 | $0.75 | N/A |
| AMAT | $188.12 | +0.59% | 151B | 22.89 | $8.22 | +0.88% |
| LRCX | $97.78 | +0.70% | 125.1B | 27.24 | $3.59 | +0.94% |
Stock Comparison
TXN vs NVDA Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while NVDA trades at $173.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 55.88. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check NVDA's competition here
TXN vs AVGO Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while AVGO trades at $288.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 104.99. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AVGO's competition here
TXN vs TSM Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while TSM trades at $241.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check TSM's competition here
TXN vs ASML Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 285.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ASML trades at $725.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ASML's competition here
TXN vs AMD Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 262.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while AMD trades at $162.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 117.48. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AMD's competition here
TXN vs QCOM Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 174.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while QCOM trades at $158.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check QCOM's competition here
TXN vs ARM Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 169.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ARM trades at $159.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 213.32. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ARM's competition here
TXN vs AMAT Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 151B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while AMAT trades at $188.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AMAT's competition here
TXN vs LRCX Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 125.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while LRCX trades at $97.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check LRCX's competition here
TXN vs MU Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 125B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while MU trades at $111.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MU's competition here
TXN vs KLAC Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while KLAC trades at $904.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check KLAC's competition here
TXN vs ADI Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ADI trades at $226.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 61.68. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ADI's competition here
TXN vs INTC Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while INTC trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check INTC's competition here
TXN vs MRVL Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while MRVL trades at $74.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -129.89. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MRVL's competition here
TXN vs NXPI Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while NXPI trades at $224.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check NXPI's competition here
TXN vs MCHP Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while MCHP trades at $67.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6781.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MCHP's competition here
TXN vs MPWR Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while MPWR trades at $713.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MPWR's competition here
TXN vs STM Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while STM trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check STM's competition here
TXN vs ON Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ON trades at $55.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ON's competition here
TXN vs ASX Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ASX trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ASX's competition here
TXN vs GFS Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while GFS trades at $39.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -115.35. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check GFS's competition here
TXN vs ALAB Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ALAB trades at $121.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 92.88. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ALAB's competition here
TXN vs UMC Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while UMC trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check UMC's competition here
TXN vs TER Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while TER trades at $91.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check TER's competition here
TXN vs ENTG Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ENTG trades at $91.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 44.67. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ENTG's competition here
TXN vs SWKS Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while SWKS trades at $72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SWKS's competition here
TXN vs MTSI Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while MTSI trades at $137.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -115.37. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MTSI's competition here
TXN vs CREE Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check CREE's competition here
TXN vs QRVO Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while QRVO trades at $86.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 148.60. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check QRVO's competition here
TXN vs BRKS Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check BRKS's competition here
TXN vs NVMI Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while NVMI trades at $261.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 39.51. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check NVMI's competition here
TXN vs LSCC Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while LSCC trades at $52.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 141.22. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check LSCC's competition here
TXN vs OLED Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while OLED trades at $149.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check OLED's competition here
TXN vs RMBS Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while RMBS trades at $64.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check RMBS's competition here
TXN vs ALGM Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ALGM trades at $32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ALGM's competition here
TXN vs TSEM Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while TSEM trades at $47.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check TSEM's competition here
TXN vs AMKR Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while AMKR trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AMKR's competition here
TXN vs CRUS Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while CRUS trades at $100.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check CRUS's competition here
TXN vs SITM Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while SITM trades at $193.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -50.95. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SITM's competition here
TXN vs ONTO Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ONTO trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ONTO's competition here
TXN vs SMTC Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while SMTC trades at $52.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -31.27. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SMTC's competition here
TXN vs SLAB Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while SLAB trades at $135.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -26.64. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SLAB's competition here
TXN vs CAMT Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while CAMT trades at $94.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check CAMT's competition here
TXN vs IPGP Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while IPGP trades at $75.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -16.73. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check IPGP's competition here
TXN vs POWI Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while POWI trades at $52.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 81.91. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check POWI's competition here
TXN vs AMBA Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while AMBA trades at $67.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -27.21. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AMBA's competition here
TXN vs FORM Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while FORM trades at $34.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 49.62. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check FORM's competition here
TXN vs SYNA Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while SYNA trades at $66.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SYNA's competition here
TXN vs SIMO Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while SIMO trades at $73.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SIMO's competition here
TXN vs DIOD Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while DIOD trades at $50.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 92.09. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check DIOD's competition here
TXN vs ACLS Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ACLS trades at $72.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ACLS's competition here
TXN vs VSH Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while VSH trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -35.27. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check VSH's competition here
TXN vs ACMR Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ACMR trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ACMR's competition here
TXN vs KLIC Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while KLIC trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 92.57. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check KLIC's competition here
TXN vs NVTS Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while NVTS trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -16.94. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check NVTS's competition here
TXN vs DQ Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while DQ trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check DQ's competition here
TXN vs MXL Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while MXL trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MXL's competition here
TXN vs AAOI Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while AAOI trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AAOI's competition here
TXN vs VECO Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while VECO trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check VECO's competition here
TXN vs PLAB Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while PLAB trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check PLAB's competition here
TXN vs SGH Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SGH's competition here
TXN vs UCTT Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while UCTT trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check UCTT's competition here
TXN vs LASR Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 964.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while LASR trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -17.11. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check LASR's competition here
TXN vs COHU Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 882.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while COHU trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check COHU's competition here
TXN vs INDI Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while INDI trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check INDI's competition here
TXN vs AOSL Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 817.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while AOSL trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -35.66. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AOSL's competition here
TXN vs ICHR Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 718.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ICHR trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -44.79. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ICHR's competition here
TXN vs IMOS Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 653M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while IMOS trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check IMOS's competition here
TXN vs AEHR Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 634.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while AEHR trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -164.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AEHR's competition here
TXN vs CEVA Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 546.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while CEVA trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 253.89. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check CEVA's competition here
TXN vs NA Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 529.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while NA trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check NA's competition here
TXN vs POET Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 527.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while POET trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check POET's competition here
TXN vs SKYT Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 488.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while SKYT trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -59.76. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check SKYT's competition here
TXN vs LAES Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 468.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while LAES trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check LAES's competition here
TXN vs HIMX Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 418.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while HIMX trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check HIMX's competition here
TXN vs BZAI Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 407.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while BZAI trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check BZAI's competition here
TXN vs AIP Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 391.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while AIP trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AIP's competition here
TXN vs VLN-WT Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while VLN-WT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check VLN-WT's competition here
TXN vs XPER Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 344.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while XPER trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -17.53. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check XPER's competition here
TXN vs ALMU Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 342.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ALMU trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -83.42. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ALMU's competition here
TXN vs VLN Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 330.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while VLN trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check VLN's competition here
TXN vs TGAN Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check TGAN's competition here
TXN vs NVEC Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 308.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while NVEC trades at $63.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check NVEC's competition here
TXN vs WOLF Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, WOLF has a market cap of 276.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while WOLF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas WOLF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WOLF's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to WOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check WOLF's competition here
TXN vs ATOM Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 161.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ATOM trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ATOM's competition here
TXN vs MX Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 147.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while MX trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MX's competition here
TXN vs MRAM Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while MRAM trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 163.50. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MRAM's competition here
TXN vs OIIM Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check OIIM's competition here
TXN vs GSIT Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while GSIT trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check GSIT's competition here
TXN vs AXTI Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while AXTI trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check AXTI's competition here
TXN vs QUIK Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while QUIK trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -15.68. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check QUIK's competition here
TXN vs INTT Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while INTT trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -719.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check INTT's competition here
TXN vs ICG Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ICG trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ICG's competition here
TXN vs GCTS Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while GCTS trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check GCTS's competition here
TXN vs PXLW Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while PXLW trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check PXLW's competition here
TXN vs ASYS Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while ASYS trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check ASYS's competition here
TXN vs MOSY Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MOSY's competition here
TXN vs WISA Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check WISA's competition here
TXN vs MOBX Comparison July 2025
TXN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TXN stands at 168.7B. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TXN is priced at $185.69, while MOBX trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TXN currently has a P/E ratio of 35.24, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, TXN's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TXN is less volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TXN.Check MOBX's competition here