Unilever PLC
Unilever PLC UL Peers
See (UL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UL | $61.04 | +0.26% | 149.8B | 22.95 | $2.66 | +3.18% |
PG | $158.81 | +0.33% | 372.3B | 25.20 | $6.30 | +2.61% |
CL | $88.45 | -0.38% | 71.7B | 25.07 | $3.53 | +2.31% |
KVUE | $22.50 | -0.18% | 43.2B | 40.20 | $0.56 | +3.65% |
KMB | $127.75 | +0.02% | 42.4B | 17.43 | $7.33 | +3.89% |
EL | $86.77 | -3.24% | 31.2B | -35.85 | -$2.42 | +1.96% |
CHD | $97.28 | +0.23% | 24B | 41.74 | $2.33 | +1.19% |
CLX | $131.42 | -0.01% | 16.2B | 23.60 | $5.57 | +3.72% |
SGI | $73.88 | -1.49% | 15.4B | 47.35 | $1.56 | +0.41% |
HIMS | $57.32 | -1.21% | 12.3B | 84.26 | $0.68 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UL vs PG Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 372.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while PG trades at $158.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs CL Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while CL trades at $88.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CL's ROE of +10.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs KVUE Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while KVUE trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs KMB Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while KMB trades at $127.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KMB's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs EL Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while EL trades at $86.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -35.85. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs CHD Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while CHD trades at $97.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 41.74. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs CLX Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while CLX trades at $131.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CLX's ROE of +7.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs SGI Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while SGI trades at $73.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 47.35. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs HIMS Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, HIMS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while HIMS trades at $57.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas HIMS's P/E ratio is 84.26. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HIMS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HIMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs ELF Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while ELF trades at $119.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 62.07. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs NTCO Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs COTY Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while COTY trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs IPAR Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while IPAR trades at $122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs NWL Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while NWL trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs SPB Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while SPB trades at $59.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs EPC Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while EPC trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EPC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs HELE Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 540.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while HELE trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs NUS Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 442.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while NUS trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs SLSN Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 313.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while SLSN trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 89.40. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs SKIN Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 230.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while SKIN trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs EWCZ Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 217.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while EWCZ trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs ACU Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 165.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while ACU trades at $43.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs DSY Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while DSY trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is 43.67. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs GROV Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while GROV trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs RAY Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while RAY trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs UG Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while UG trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs PHH Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while PHH trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs MTEX Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while MTEX trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -70.55. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs BRSH Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs TANH Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while TANH trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs TKLF Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while TKLF trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs BRSHW Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs REV Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.
UL vs SUMR Comparison
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 149.8B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $61.04, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 22.95, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.