Unum Group
Unum Group (UNM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UNM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNM | $80.76 | +0.94% | 14.1B | 9.52 | $8.48 | +2.13% |
| AFL | $103.37 | +0.90% | 55.9B | 16.08 | $6.43 | +2.09% |
| MFC | $31.32 | +0.58% | 53.6B | 16.14 | $1.94 | +3.92% |
| MET-PE | $24.00 | +0.17% | 52.7B | 3.07 | $7.81 | +2.81% |
| MET | $78.56 | +1.00% | 52.7B | 12.84 | $6.12 | +2.81% |
| MET-PA | $23.70 | -0.29% | 52.5B | 3.04 | $7.81 | +2.81% |
| PRH | $25.51 | +0.39% | 37.5B | N/A | N/A | +5.84% |
| PRU | $105.21 | +0.86% | 37.2B | 16.60 | $6.34 | +5.04% |
| PRS | $24.12 | +0.25% | 37B | N/A | N/A | +5.82% |
| PUK | $25.23 | +0.28% | 32.4B | 15.02 | $1.68 | +1.84% |
Stock Comparison
UNM vs AFL Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while AFL trades at $103.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check AFL's competition here
UNM vs MFC Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while MFC trades at $31.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MFC's competition here
UNM vs MET-PE Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while MET-PE trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MET-PE's competition here
UNM vs MET Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while MET trades at $78.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MET's competition here
UNM vs MET-PA Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while MET-PA trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MET-PA's competition here
UNM vs PRH Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while PRH trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRH's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check PRH's competition here
UNM vs PRU Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while PRU trades at $105.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check PRU's competition here
UNM vs PRS Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while PRS trades at $24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check PRS's competition here
UNM vs PUK Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while PUK trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check PUK's competition here
UNM vs MET-PF Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while MET-PF trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.56. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MET-PF's competition here
UNM vs GL Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while GL trades at $135.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check GL's competition here
UNM vs GL-PD Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while GL-PD trades at $16.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check GL-PD's competition here
UNM vs PRI Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while PRI trades at $265.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check PRI's competition here
UNM vs JXN Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while JXN trades at $88.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 66.84. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check JXN's competition here
UNM vs LNC Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while LNC trades at $34.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check LNC's competition here
UNM vs LNC-PD Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while LNC-PD trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check LNC-PD's competition here
UNM vs AEL Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check AEL's competition here
UNM vs FG Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while FG trades at $32.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check FG's competition here
UNM vs FGN Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while FGN trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check FGN's competition here
UNM vs CNO Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while CNO trades at $37.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check CNO's competition here
UNM vs GNW Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while GNW trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check GNW's competition here
UNM vs BHFAP Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while BHFAP trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHFAP's competition here
UNM vs BHFAL Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while BHFAL trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHFAL's competition here
UNM vs BHF Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while BHF trades at $50.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHF's competition here
UNM vs JXN-PA Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while JXN-PA trades at $26.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check JXN-PA's competition here
UNM vs AEL-PB Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check AEL-PB's competition here
UNM vs NWLI Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check NWLI's competition here
UNM vs AEL-PA Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check AEL-PA's competition here
UNM vs MHNC Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while MHNC trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MHNC's competition here
UNM vs BHFAO Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 942.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while BHFAO trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHFAO's competition here
UNM vs BHFAN Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 769.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while BHFAN trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHFAN's competition here
UNM vs BHFAM Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 667.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while BHFAM trades at $11.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check BHFAM's competition here
UNM vs ABLLL Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 531.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while ABLLL trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check ABLLL's competition here
UNM vs ABLLW Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 519M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while ABLLW trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check ABLLW's competition here
UNM vs ABL Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while ABL trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check ABL's competition here
UNM vs CIA Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 205.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while CIA trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check CIA's competition here
UNM vs VERY Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check VERY's competition here
UNM vs MDWT Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check MDWT's competition here
UNM vs AAME Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while AAME trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is -22.60. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAME's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check AAME's competition here
UNM vs IHC Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check IHC's competition here
UNM vs LFC Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check LFC's competition here
UNM vs GWGH Comparison July 2025
UNM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UNM stands at 14.1B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UNM is priced at $80.76, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UNM currently has a P/E ratio of 9.52, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, UNM's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, UNM is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UNM.Check GWGH's competition here