U.S. Bancorp PERP PFD SER A
U.S. Bancorp PERP PFD SER A USB-PA Peers
See (USB-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USB-PA | $840.90 | +0.32% | 68.6B | 239.57 | $3.51 | +4.45% |
| HDB | $77.48 | +2.33% | 197.8B | 23.91 | $3.24 | +0.76% |
| PNC | $178.64 | +2.26% | 70.7B | 12.62 | $14.16 | +3.59% |
| MFG | $5.57 | +0.63% | 69.8B | 11.36 | $0.49 | +1.15% |
| USB | $44.74 | +2.42% | 69.7B | 11.07 | $4.04 | +4.45% |
| USB-PP | $22.86 | -0.51% | 68.4B | 4.93 | $4.64 | +4.45% |
| USB-PS | $18.67 | -0.53% | 68.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.45% |
| USB-PH | $20.59 | -0.93% | 67.9B | 4.44 | $4.64 | +4.45% |
| ITUB | $6.56 | +0.54% | 66.9B | 9.64 | $0.68 | +7.28% |
| LYG | $4.21 | +0.36% | 63B | 12.74 | $0.33 | +3.76% |
Stock Comparison
USB-PA vs HDB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 197.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while HDB trades at $77.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs PNC Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while PNC trades at $178.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs MFG Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while MFG trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs USB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while USB trades at $44.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs USB-PP Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while USB-PP trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs USB-PS Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while USB-PS trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs USB-PH Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while USB-PH trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs ITUB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while ITUB trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs LYG Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while LYG trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs IBN Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while IBN trades at $34.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs DB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while DB trades at $28.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs TFC Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while TFC trades at $40.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -213.92. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs BSBR Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while BSBR trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs HBANL Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while HBANL trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs HBANM Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while HBANM trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs MTB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while MTB trades at $184.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs KB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while KB trades at $77.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs TFC-PI Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while TFC-PI trades at $21.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs BBD Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while BBD trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs TFC-PO Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while TFC-PO trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs BBDO Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while BBDO trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FITB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FITB trades at $39.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs USB-PR Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while USB-PR trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs HBANP Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while HBANP trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.12. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs TFC-PR Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while TFC-PR trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FCNCA Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FCNCA trades at $1,856.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FCNCP Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FCNCP trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FCNCO Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FCNCO trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs USB-PQ Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while USB-PQ trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs HBAN Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while HBAN trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs RF-PF Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while RF-PF trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs SHG Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while SHG trades at $42.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs RF Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while RF trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs RF-PC Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while RF-PC trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs CFG Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while CFG trades at $41.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs KEY Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while KEY trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -85.89. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs KEY-PK Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while KEY-PK trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs KEY-PJ Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs KEY-PL Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while KEY-PL trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs KEY-PI Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while KEY-PI trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs BAP Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while BAP trades at $217.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FITBI Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FITBI trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FITBP Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FITBP trades at $24.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs RF-PE Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while RF-PE trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs BCH Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while BCH trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs CFG-PD Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs VLYPN Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while VLYPN trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FITBO Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FITBO trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FHN-PB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FHN-PB trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FHN-PC Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FHN-PC trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs CFG-PH Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while CFG-PH trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FHN-PE Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FHN-PE trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs BSAC Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while BSAC trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs CIB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while CIB trades at $43.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs WF Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while WF trades at $43.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FHN Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FHN trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs SSB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while SSB trades at $89.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs WBS Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while WBS trades at $53.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FHN-PD Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FHN-PF Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FHN-PF trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs CBSH Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while CBSH trades at $63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs PNFP Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while PNFP trades at $108.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs CFR Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while CFR trades at $129.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs CFG-PE Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while CFG-PE trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs WAL Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while WAL trades at $74.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs WTFC Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while WTFC trades at $121.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs WTFCM Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while WTFCM trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs UMBF Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while UMBF trades at $104.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs ONB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while ONB trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs ONBPO Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while ONBPO trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs ONBPP Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while ONBPP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs CMA Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while CMA trades at $58.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs BSMX Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs GGAL Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while GGAL trades at $55.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs ZION Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while ZION trades at $49.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs BPOP Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while BPOP trades at $105.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs SNV Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while SNV trades at $49.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs PB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while PB trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs SNV-PD Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while SNV-PD trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs BOKF Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while BOKF trades at $96.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs CADE Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while CADE trades at $30.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs HOMB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while HOMB trades at $28.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs BXS Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FFIN Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FFIN trades at $36.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs OZK Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while OZK trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs UBSI Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while UBSI trades at $36.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FNB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FNB trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs COLB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while COLB trades at $23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs VLY Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while VLY trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs FLG Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while FLG trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs BMA Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while BMA trades at $76.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is -92.07. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs VLYPO Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while VLYPO trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs VLYPP Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while VLYPP trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs GBCI Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while GBCI trades at $42.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs HWC Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while HWC trades at $54.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs HWCPZ Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while HWCPZ trades at $23.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs NYCB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, NYCB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while NYCB trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas NYCB's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NYCB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to NYCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs AUB Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while AUB trades at $30.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.
USB-PA vs AUBAP Comparison
USB-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB-PA stands at 68.6B. In comparison, AUBAP has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB-PA is priced at $840.90, while AUBAP trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 239.57, whereas AUBAP's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, USB-PA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUBAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, USB-PA is less volatile compared to AUBAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB-PA.