Vale S.A.
Vale S.A. (VALE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VALE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VALE | $10.23 | -1.63% | 43.6B | 7.41 | $1.38 | +8.13% |
| RIO | $63.83 | -1.22% | 99.7B | 9.03 | $7.07 | +6.29% |
| BHP | $54.08 | -2.22% | 68.6B | 12.07 | $4.48 | +4.55% |
| TECK | $35.12 | -8.99% | 17.2B | 702.40 | $0.05 | +2.04% |
| MP | $61.56 | +0.69% | 10.9B | -97.62 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $8.10 | +6.16% | 3.2B | -35.22 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| MTRN | $94.18 | -3.28% | 2B | 196.29 | $0.48 | +0.58% |
| SKE | $16.08 | -1.53% | 1.8B | -13.87 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| STR | $18.45 | +0.82% | 1.4B | 35.48 | $0.52 | +7.29% |
| IPX | $40.88 | +12.77% | 1.3B | -18.84 | -$2.17 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VALE vs RIO Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 99.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while RIO trades at $63.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check RIO's competition here
VALE vs BHP Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while BHP trades at $54.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check BHP's competition here
VALE vs TECK Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while TECK trades at $35.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 702.40. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check TECK's competition here
VALE vs MP Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while MP trades at $61.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -97.62. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check MP's competition here
VALE vs TMC Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while TMC trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -35.22. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check TMC's competition here
VALE vs MTRN Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while MTRN trades at $94.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 196.29. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check MTRN's competition here
VALE vs SKE Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while SKE trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check SKE's competition here
VALE vs STR Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while STR trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check STR's competition here
VALE vs IPX Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while IPX trades at $40.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -18.84. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check IPX's competition here
VALE vs USAR Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while USAR trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USAR's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check USAR's competition here
VALE vs VZLA Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while VZLA trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -167.25. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check VZLA's competition here
VALE vs TMCWW Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 885.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while TMCWW trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check TMCWW's competition here
VALE vs CMP Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 874.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while CMP trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check CMP's competition here
VALE vs GSM Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 852.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while GSM trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -19.87. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check GSM's competition here
VALE vs SGML Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 803.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while SGML trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -21.88. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check SGML's competition here
VALE vs LAC Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 701.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while LAC trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check LAC's competition here
VALE vs NEXA Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 662.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while NEXA trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check NEXA's competition here
VALE vs USAS Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 650.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while USAS trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check USAS's competition here
VALE vs SLI Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 531.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while SLI trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check SLI's competition here
VALE vs LAR Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 492.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while LAR trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -43.43. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check LAR's competition here
VALE vs NAK Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 479.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while NAK trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check NAK's competition here
VALE vs CRMLW Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 470.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while CRMLW trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check CRMLW's competition here
VALE vs LAAC Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check LAAC's competition here
VALE vs UAMY Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 425.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while UAMY trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -357.50. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check UAMY's competition here
VALE vs CRML Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 416.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while CRML trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check CRML's competition here
VALE vs PLM Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check PLM's competition here
VALE vs GRFX Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check GRFX's competition here
VALE vs LZM Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 378.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while LZM trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check LZM's competition here
VALE vs USARW Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 352M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while USARW trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USARW's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check USARW's competition here
VALE vs EMX Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while EMX trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -103.17. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check EMX's competition here
VALE vs NMG Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 317.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while NMG trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check NMG's competition here
VALE vs ABAT Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 311.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while ABAT trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check ABAT's competition here
VALE vs TMQ Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 311.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while TMQ trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -31.58. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check TMQ's competition here
VALE vs WRN Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 271M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while WRN trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -67.75. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check WRN's competition here
VALE vs NB Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 231M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while NB trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -16.74. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check NB's competition here
VALE vs IONR Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 208.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while IONR trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -15.37. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check IONR's competition here
VALE vs PLL Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 188.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while PLL trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check PLL's competition here
VALE vs USGO Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while USGO trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -12.06. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check USGO's competition here
VALE vs LGO Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 102.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while LGO trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check LGO's competition here
VALE vs FURY Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while FURY trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check FURY's competition here
VALE vs GRO Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 74.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while GRO trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check GRO's competition here
VALE vs AMLI Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while AMLI trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check AMLI's competition here
VALE vs WWR Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while WWR trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check WWR's competition here
VALE vs XPL Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while XPL trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check XPL's competition here
VALE vs LITM Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while LITM trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check LITM's competition here
VALE vs ELBM Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while ELBM trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check ELBM's competition here
VALE vs GTI Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while GTI trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check GTI's competition here
VALE vs BYU Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check BYU's competition here
VALE vs STR-WT Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check STR-WT's competition here
VALE vs GLG Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check GLG's competition here
VALE vs KMCM Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. VALE has daily volatility of 1.66 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
VALE vs IFFT Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check IFFT's competition here
VALE vs SMTS Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check SMTS's competition here
VALE vs VEDL Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check VEDL's competition here
VALE vs EXN Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check EXN's competition here
VALE vs BBL Comparison July 2025
VALE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VALE stands at 43.6B. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VALE is priced at $10.23, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VALE currently has a P/E ratio of 7.41, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, VALE's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VALE is less volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VALE.Check BBL's competition here