Wearable Devices Ltd.
Wearable Devices Ltd. (WLDSW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WLDSW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLDSW | $1.66 | +0.00% | 1.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| AAPL | $213.88 | +0.06% | 3.2T | 30.17 | $7.09 | +0.47% |
| SONY | $24.88 | -1.95% | 149.9B | 19.44 | $1.28 | +0.48% |
| FIS | $81.94 | +1.90% | 43.1B | 52.20 | $1.57 | +1.86% |
| LPL | $3.83 | +6.69% | 3.8B | -2.70 | -$1.42 | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $11.25 | -0.27% | 1.4B | -20.09 | -$0.56 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| TBCH | $14.54 | +1.54% | 292.9M | 19.65 | $0.74 | N/A |
| GPRO | $1.51 | +2.72% | 241.9M | -1.72 | -$0.88 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WLDSW vs AAPL Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3.2T. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while AAPL trades at $213.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 30.17. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check AAPL's competition here
WLDSW vs SONY Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 149.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while SONY trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to SONY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check SONY's competition here
WLDSW vs FIS Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while FIS trades at $81.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 52.20. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check FIS's competition here
WLDSW vs LPL Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while LPL trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check LPL's competition here
WLDSW vs VZIO Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW and VZIO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VZIO's competition here
WLDSW vs SONO Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while SONO trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -20.09. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check SONO's competition here
WLDSW vs HEAR Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check HEAR's competition here
WLDSW vs TBCH Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 292.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while TBCH trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check TBCH's competition here
WLDSW vs GPRO Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 241.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while GPRO trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check GPRO's competition here
WLDSW vs VUZI Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 173.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while VUZI trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check VUZI's competition here
WLDSW vs VOXX Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW and VOXX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VOXX's competition here
WLDSW vs BWSN Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while BWSN trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BWSN's competition here
WLDSW vs BWNB Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while BWNB trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check BWNB's competition here
WLDSW vs UEIC Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, UEIC has a market cap of 83.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while UEIC trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEIC's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to UEIC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to UEIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check UEIC's competition here
WLDSW vs AXIL Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while AXIL trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 34.76. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check AXIL's competition here
WLDSW vs KOSS Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while KOSS trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -69.00. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check KOSS's competition here
WLDSW vs FOXX Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FOXX has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while FOXX trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOXX's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to FOXX's ROE of +8.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to FOXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check FOXX's competition here
WLDSW vs ZEPP Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while ZEPP trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check ZEPP's competition here
WLDSW vs FEBO Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while FEBO trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check FEBO's competition here
WLDSW vs MSN Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while MSN trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check MSN's competition here
WLDSW vs PXDT Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW and PXDT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXDT's competition here
WLDSW vs MICS Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to MICS's ROE of -5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check MICS's competition here
WLDSW vs UTME Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check UTME's competition here
WLDSW vs RIME Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while RIME trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to RIME's ROE of +41.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check RIME's competition here
WLDSW vs WTO Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while WTO trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to WTO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check WTO's competition here
WLDSW vs WLDS Comparison July 2025
WLDSW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WLDSW stands at 1.6M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WLDSW is priced at $1.66, while WLDS trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WLDSW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, WLDSW's ROE is -2.84%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WLDSW is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WLDSW.Check WLDS's competition here