Wolfspeed, Inc.
Wolfspeed, Inc. WOLF Peers
See (WOLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Semiconductors Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOLF | $1.78 | +4.09% | 276.2M | -0.21 | -$8.26 | N/A |
| NVDA | $173.74 | +1.73% | 4.2T | 55.88 | $3.11 | +0.02% |
| AVGO | $288.71 | +1.77% | 1.4T | 104.99 | $2.75 | +0.80% |
| TSM | $241.60 | +0.53% | 1.3T | 28.39 | $8.51 | +1.08% |
| ASML | $725.08 | +1.14% | 285.1B | 25.80 | $28.10 | +0.91% |
| AMD | $162.12 | +2.19% | 262.9B | 117.48 | $1.38 | N/A |
| QCOM | $158.84 | -0.65% | 174.4B | 16.21 | $9.80 | +2.17% |
| ARM | $159.99 | +0.45% | 169.1B | 213.32 | $0.75 | N/A |
| TXN | $185.69 | -0.30% | 168.7B | 35.24 | $5.27 | +2.89% |
| AMAT | $188.12 | +0.59% | 151B | 22.89 | $8.22 | +0.88% |
Stock Comparison
WOLF vs NVDA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, NVDA has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while NVDA trades at $173.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NVDA's P/E ratio is 55.88. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NVDA's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to NVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AVGO Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, AVGO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while AVGO trades at $288.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AVGO's P/E ratio is 104.99. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AVGO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AVGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs TSM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, TSM has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while TSM trades at $241.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TSM's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to TSM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to TSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ASML Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ASML has a market cap of 285.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ASML trades at $725.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ASML's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ASML's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ASML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AMD Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, AMD has a market cap of 262.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while AMD trades at $162.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AMD's P/E ratio is 117.48. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AMD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs QCOM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, QCOM has a market cap of 174.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while QCOM trades at $158.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QCOM's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to QCOM's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to QCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ARM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ARM has a market cap of 169.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ARM trades at $159.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ARM's P/E ratio is 213.32. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ARM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ARM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs TXN Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, TXN has a market cap of 168.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while TXN trades at $185.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TXN's P/E ratio is 35.24. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to TXN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to TXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AMAT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, AMAT has a market cap of 151B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while AMAT trades at $188.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AMAT's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AMAT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs LRCX Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, LRCX has a market cap of 125.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while LRCX trades at $97.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LRCX's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to LRCX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to LRCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MU Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, MU has a market cap of 125B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while MU trades at $111.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MU's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs KLAC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, KLAC has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while KLAC trades at $904.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas KLAC's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to KLAC's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to KLAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ADI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ADI has a market cap of 112.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ADI trades at $226.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ADI's P/E ratio is 61.68. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ADI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs INTC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, INTC has a market cap of 98.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while INTC trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas INTC's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to INTC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to INTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MRVL Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, MRVL has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while MRVL trades at $74.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MRVL's P/E ratio is -129.89. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MRVL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs NXPI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, NXPI has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while NXPI trades at $224.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NXPI's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NXPI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to NXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MCHP Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, MCHP has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while MCHP trades at $67.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MCHP's P/E ratio is -6781.00. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MCHP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MCHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MPWR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, MPWR has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while MPWR trades at $713.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MPWR's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MPWR's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MPWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs STM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, STM has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while STM trades at $26.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas STM's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to STM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to STM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ON Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ON has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ON trades at $55.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ON's P/E ratio is 38.50. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ON's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ASX Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ASX has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ASX trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ASX's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ASX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ASX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs GFS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, GFS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while GFS trades at $39.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GFS's P/E ratio is -115.35. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to GFS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to GFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ALAB Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ALAB has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ALAB trades at $121.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ALAB's P/E ratio is 92.88. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ALAB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ALAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs UMC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, UMC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while UMC trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas UMC's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to UMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to UMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs TER Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, TER has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while TER trades at $91.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TER's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to TER's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to TER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ENTG Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ENTG has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ENTG trades at $91.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ENTG's P/E ratio is 44.67. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ENTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ENTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SWKS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, SWKS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while SWKS trades at $72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SWKS's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SWKS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MTSI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, MTSI has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while MTSI trades at $137.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MTSI's P/E ratio is -115.37. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MTSI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs CREE Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, CREE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while CREE trades at $79.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to CREE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to CREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs QRVO Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, QRVO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while QRVO trades at $86.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QRVO's P/E ratio is 148.60. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to QRVO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to QRVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs BRKS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, BRKS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while BRKS trades at $113.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BRKS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to BRKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to BRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs NVMI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, NVMI has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while NVMI trades at $261.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NVMI's P/E ratio is 39.51. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NVMI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to NVMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs LSCC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, LSCC has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while LSCC trades at $52.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LSCC's P/E ratio is 141.22. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to LSCC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to LSCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs OLED Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, OLED has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while OLED trades at $149.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas OLED's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to OLED's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to OLED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs RMBS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, RMBS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while RMBS trades at $64.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas RMBS's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to RMBS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to RMBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ALGM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ALGM has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ALGM trades at $32.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ALGM's P/E ratio is -84.00. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ALGM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ALGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs TSEM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, TSEM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while TSEM trades at $47.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TSEM's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to TSEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to TSEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AMKR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, AMKR has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while AMKR trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AMKR's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AMKR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AMKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs CRUS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, CRUS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while CRUS trades at $100.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CRUS's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to CRUS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to CRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SITM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, SITM has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while SITM trades at $193.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SITM's P/E ratio is -50.95. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SITM's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ONTO Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ONTO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ONTO trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ONTO's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ONTO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ONTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SMTC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, SMTC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while SMTC trades at $52.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SMTC's P/E ratio is -31.27. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SMTC's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SLAB Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, SLAB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while SLAB trades at $135.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SLAB's P/E ratio is -26.64. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SLAB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs CAMT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, CAMT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while CAMT trades at $94.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CAMT's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to CAMT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to CAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs IPGP Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, IPGP has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while IPGP trades at $75.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas IPGP's P/E ratio is -16.73. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to IPGP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to IPGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs POWI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, POWI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while POWI trades at $52.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas POWI's P/E ratio is 81.91. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to POWI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to POWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AMBA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, AMBA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while AMBA trades at $67.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AMBA's P/E ratio is -27.21. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AMBA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs FORM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, FORM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while FORM trades at $34.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas FORM's P/E ratio is 49.62. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to FORM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to FORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SYNA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, SYNA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while SYNA trades at $66.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SYNA's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SYNA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SIMO Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, SIMO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while SIMO trades at $73.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SIMO's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SIMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs DIOD Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, DIOD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while DIOD trades at $50.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas DIOD's P/E ratio is 92.09. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to DIOD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to DIOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ACLS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ACLS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ACLS trades at $72.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ACLS's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ACLS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ACLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs VSH Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, VSH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while VSH trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VSH's P/E ratio is -35.27. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to VSH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to VSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ACMR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ACMR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ACMR trades at $29.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ACMR's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ACMR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ACMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs KLIC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, KLIC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while KLIC trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas KLIC's P/E ratio is 92.57. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to KLIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to KLIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs NVTS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, NVTS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while NVTS trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NVTS's P/E ratio is -16.94. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NVTS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to NVTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs DQ Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, DQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while DQ trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas DQ's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to DQ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to DQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MXL Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, MXL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while MXL trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MXL's P/E ratio is -6.98. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MXL's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AAOI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, AAOI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while AAOI trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AAOI's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AAOI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AAOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs VECO Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, VECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while VECO trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VECO's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to VECO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to VECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs PLAB Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, PLAB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while PLAB trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas PLAB's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to PLAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to PLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SGH Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, SGH has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while SGH trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SGH's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SGH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs UCTT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, UCTT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while UCTT trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas UCTT's P/E ratio is 38.23. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to UCTT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to UCTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs LASR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, LASR has a market cap of 964.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while LASR trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LASR's P/E ratio is -17.11. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to LASR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to LASR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs COHU Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, COHU has a market cap of 882.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while COHU trades at $18.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas COHU's P/E ratio is -10.31. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to COHU's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to COHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs INDI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, INDI has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while INDI trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas INDI's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to INDI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to INDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AOSL Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, AOSL has a market cap of 817.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while AOSL trades at $27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AOSL's P/E ratio is -35.66. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AOSL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AOSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ICHR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ICHR has a market cap of 718.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ICHR trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ICHR's P/E ratio is -44.79. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ICHR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ICHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs IMOS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, IMOS has a market cap of 653M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while IMOS trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas IMOS's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to IMOS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to IMOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AEHR Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, AEHR has a market cap of 634.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while AEHR trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AEHR's P/E ratio is -164.00. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AEHR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AEHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs CEVA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, CEVA has a market cap of 546.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while CEVA trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas CEVA's P/E ratio is 253.89. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to CEVA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to CEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs NA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, NA has a market cap of 529.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while NA trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NA's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to NA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs POET Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, POET has a market cap of 527.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while POET trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas POET's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to POET's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to POET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs SKYT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, SKYT has a market cap of 488.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while SKYT trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas SKYT's P/E ratio is -59.76. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to SKYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to SKYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs LAES Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, LAES has a market cap of 468.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while LAES trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas LAES's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to LAES's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to LAES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs HIMX Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, HIMX has a market cap of 418.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while HIMX trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas HIMX's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to HIMX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to HIMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs BZAI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, BZAI has a market cap of 407.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while BZAI trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas BZAI's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to BZAI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is less volatile compared to BZAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AIP Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, AIP has a market cap of 391.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while AIP trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AIP's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AIP's ROE of -87.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs VLN-WT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, VLN-WT has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while VLN-WT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to VLN-WT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is less volatile compared to VLN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs XPER Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, XPER has a market cap of 344.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while XPER trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas XPER's P/E ratio is -17.53. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to XPER's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to XPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ALMU Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ALMU has a market cap of 342.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ALMU trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ALMU's P/E ratio is -83.42. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ALMU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ALMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs VLN Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, VLN has a market cap of 330.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while VLN trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas VLN's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to VLN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to VLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs TGAN Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, TGAN has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while TGAN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas TGAN's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to TGAN's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to TGAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs NVEC Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, NVEC has a market cap of 308.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while NVEC trades at $63.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas NVEC's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to NVEC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is less volatile compared to NVEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ATOM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ATOM has a market cap of 161.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ATOM trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ATOM's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ATOM's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ATOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MX Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, MX has a market cap of 147.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while MX trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MX's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MRAM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, MRAM has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while MRAM trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MRAM's P/E ratio is 163.50. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MRAM's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MRAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs OIIM Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, OIIM has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while OIIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas OIIM's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to OIIM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to OIIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs GSIT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, GSIT has a market cap of 141.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while GSIT trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GSIT's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to GSIT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to GSIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs AXTI Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, AXTI has a market cap of 108.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while AXTI trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas AXTI's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to AXTI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to AXTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs QUIK Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, QUIK has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while QUIK trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas QUIK's P/E ratio is -15.68. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to QUIK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to QUIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs INTT Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, INTT has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while INTT trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas INTT's P/E ratio is -719.00. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to INTT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to INTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ICG Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ICG has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ICG trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ICG's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ICG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ICG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs GCTS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, GCTS has a market cap of 82.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while GCTS trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas GCTS's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to GCTS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to GCTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs PXLW Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, PXLW has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while PXLW trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas PXLW's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to PXLW's ROE of +3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to PXLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs ASYS Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, ASYS has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while ASYS trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas ASYS's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to ASYS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to ASYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MOSY Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, MOSY has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while MOSY trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MOSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MOSY's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs WISA Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, WISA has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while WISA trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas WISA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to WISA's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to WISA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.
WOLF vs MOBX Comparison
WOLF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOLF stands at 276.2M. In comparison, MOBX has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOLF is priced at $1.78, while MOBX trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOLF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.21, whereas MOBX's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, WOLF's ROE is -2.13%, compared to MOBX's ROE of -10.93%. Regarding short-term risk, WOLF is more volatile compared to MOBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOLF.