Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. WPM Peers
See (WPM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPM | $88.73 | -3.12% | 40.3B | 64.77 | $1.37 | +0.53% |
| AEM | $117.98 | -3.34% | 59.6B | 24.84 | $4.75 | +1.35% |
| NEM | $52.37 | -3.93% | 58.3B | 11.96 | $4.38 | +1.90% |
| GOLD | $19.85 | -0.90% | 34.1B | 16.27 | $1.22 | +2.02% |
| FNV | $167.22 | -3.06% | 32.2B | 52.09 | $3.21 | +0.87% |
| AU | $45.97 | -2.38% | 23.1B | 21.09 | $2.18 | +0.75% |
| GFI | $24.62 | -3.15% | 22B | 17.84 | $1.38 | +2.20% |
| KGC | $15.10 | -2.36% | 18.5B | 15.40 | $0.98 | +0.79% |
| RGLD | $175.93 | -4.31% | 11.6B | 29.13 | $6.04 | +0.96% |
| AGI | $26.66 | -1.26% | 11.2B | 43.00 | $0.62 | +0.37% |
Stock Comparison
WPM vs AEM Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while AEM trades at $117.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 24.84. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs NEM Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while NEM trades at $52.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GOLD Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while GOLD trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs FNV Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while FNV trades at $167.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 52.09. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs AU Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while AU trades at $45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GFI Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while GFI trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs KGC Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while KGC trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs RGLD Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while RGLD trades at $175.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs AGI Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while AGI trades at $26.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HMY Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while HMY trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs CDE Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while CDE trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs AUY Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs SBSW Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while SBSW trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -11.61. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs OR Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while OR trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 152.41. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs BTG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while BTG trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs EGO Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while EGO trades at $21.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs IAG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while IAG trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while HL trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 52.29. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs NGD Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while NGD trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HL-PB Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while HL-PB trades at $51.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1727.33. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs ORLA Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while ORLA trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 41.09. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs EQX Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while EQX trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs SAND Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while SAND trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 91.85. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs SSRM Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while SSRM trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs NVAWW Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while NVAWW trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs NG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while NG trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs CGAU Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while CGAU trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs SA Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while SA trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -132.09. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs DRD Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while DRD trades at $13.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs ARMN Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while ARMN trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs CNL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 942.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while CNL trades at $11.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -23.15. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs IAUX Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 476.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while IAUX trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GSS Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs DC Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 417.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while DC trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GAU Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 373.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while GAU trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -20.71. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs CMCL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 359.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while CMCL trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs NFGC Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while NFGC trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs ODV Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while ODV trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs CTGO Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 255.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while CTGO trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs THM Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while THM trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -47.75. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs IDR Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while IDR trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs DC-WT Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 188.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while DC-WT trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs USAU Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 179.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while USAU trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GSV Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GLDG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while GLDG trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs VGZ Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 120.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while VGZ trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HYMC Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while HYMC trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs TRX Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while TRX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -33.86. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GORO Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while GORO trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs PZG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while PZG trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs AUST Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while AUST trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs AAU Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs ODVWZ Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while ODVWZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HYMCL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 492.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HYMCW Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HYMCZ Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs KL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GPL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs PVG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $88.73, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 64.77, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.