W.R. Berkley Corporation 5.10%
W.R. Berkley Corporation 5.10% WRB-PF Peers
See (WRB-PF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Property & Casualty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRB-PF | $19.71 | -0.40% | 26B | N/A | N/A | +2.31% |
| PGR | $247.53 | +0.06% | 145.1B | 13.94 | $17.75 | +1.98% |
| CB | $270.15 | -3.08% | 108.3B | 13.01 | $20.77 | +1.33% |
| TRV | $264.74 | -0.76% | 59.6B | 11.71 | $22.61 | +1.59% |
| ALL | $197.61 | +0.09% | 52.3B | 13.50 | $14.64 | +1.95% |
| ALL-PH | $21.21 | -0.05% | 52.3B | 3.37 | $6.29 | +1.95% |
| ALL-PB | $25.52 | -0.58% | 52.1B | 2.12 | $12.04 | +1.95% |
| ALL-PG | $24.99 | +0.00% | 32.1B | 2.08 | $12.04 | +1.95% |
| WRB | $68.55 | +0.01% | 26B | 15.58 | $4.40 | +2.31% |
| WRB-PH | $16.25 | -0.31% | 25.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.31% |
Stock Comparison
WRB-PF vs PGR Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, PGR has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while PGR trades at $247.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGR's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PGR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to PGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs CB Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, CB has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while CB trades at $270.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs TRV Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, TRV has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while TRV trades at $264.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRV's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TRV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to TRV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs ALL Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, ALL has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while ALL trades at $197.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs ALL-PH Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, ALL-PH has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while ALL-PH trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PH's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs ALL-PB Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, ALL-PB has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while ALL-PB trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL-PB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs ALL-PG Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, ALL-PG has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while ALL-PG trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PG's P/E ratio is 2.08. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs WRB Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, WRB has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while WRB trades at $68.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WRB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to WRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs WRB-PH Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, WRB-PH has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while WRB-PH trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WRB-PH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to WRB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs WRB-PE Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, WRB-PE has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while WRB-PE trades at $22.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PE's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WRB-PE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to WRB-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs WRB-PG Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, WRB-PG has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while WRB-PG trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRB-PG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WRB-PG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to WRB-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs MKL Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, MKL has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while MKL trades at $2,023.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKL's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MKL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to MKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs CINF Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, CINF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while CINF trades at $150.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CINF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs L Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, L has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while L trades at $92.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas L's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs CNA Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, CNA has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while CNA trades at $44.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNA's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CNA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs KNSL Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, KNSL has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while KNSL trades at $479.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNSL's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KNSL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to KNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AFG Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AFG has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AFG trades at $128.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFG's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AFGD Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AFGD has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AFGD trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFGD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AFGB Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AFGB has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AFGB trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFGB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AFGE Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AFGE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AFGE trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFGE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AFGC Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AFGC has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AFGC trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AXS Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AXS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AXS trades at $97.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AXS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AXS-PE Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AXS-PE has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AXS-PE trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXS-PE's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AXS-PE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AXS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs ALL-PJ Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, ALL-PJ has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while ALL-PJ trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ALL-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs RLI Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, RLI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while RLI trades at $69.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLI's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RLI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to RLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs THG Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, THG has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while THG trades at $166.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THG's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to THG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to THG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs SIGI Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, SIGI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while SIGI trades at $90.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGI's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to SIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs ALL-PI Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, ALL-PI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while ALL-PI trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALL-PI's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ALL-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ALL-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs WTM Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, WTM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while WTM trades at $1,788.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTM's P/E ratio is 167.54. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WTM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to WTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs KMPR Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, KMPR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while KMPR trades at $62.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPR's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KMPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to KMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs KMPB Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, KMPB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while KMPB trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KMPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to KMPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs MCY Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, MCY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while MCY trades at $70.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to MCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs PLMR Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, PLMR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while PLMR trades at $136.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMR's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PLMR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to PLMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs HGTY-WT Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, HGTY-WT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while HGTY-WT trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HGTY-WT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HGTY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs LMND Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, LMND has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while LMND trades at $41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMND's P/E ratio is -13.76. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LMND's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to LMND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AHL Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AHL has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AHL trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AHL-PD Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AHL-PD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AHL-PD trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PD's P/E ratio is -82.51. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AHL-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AHL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs SKWD Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, SKWD has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while SKWD trades at $52.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKWD's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SKWD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to SKWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs ROOT Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, ROOT has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while ROOT trades at $126.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROOT's P/E ratio is 38.20. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ROOT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ROOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AHL-PE Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AHL-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AHL-PE trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PE's P/E ratio is -82.55. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AHL-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AHL-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs HMN Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, HMN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while HMN trades at $41.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMN's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HMN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs STC Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, STC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while STC trades at $59.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STC's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to STC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs HCI Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, HCI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while HCI trades at $141.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCI's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HCI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs MHLA Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, MHLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while MHLA trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHLA's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MHLA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to MHLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs PRA Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, PRA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while PRA trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRA's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to PRA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to PRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs BOW Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, BOW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while BOW trades at $33.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOW's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BOW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to BOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs SAFT Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, SAFT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while SAFT trades at $71.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAFT's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SAFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to SAFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs ARGO Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, ARGO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while ARGO trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ARGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs SIGIP Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, SIGIP has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while SIGIP trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGIP's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SIGIP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to SIGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs HGTY Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, HGTY has a market cap of 933.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while HGTY trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGTY's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HGTY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs UVE Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, UVE has a market cap of 716.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while UVE trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVE's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UVE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to UVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs UFCS Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, UFCS has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while UFCS trades at $27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFCS's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UFCS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to UFCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs HRTG Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, HRTG has a market cap of 679.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while HRTG trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRTG's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HRTG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to HRTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs DGICA Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, DGICA has a market cap of 653M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while DGICA trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICA's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DGICA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to DGICA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs DGICB Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, DGICB has a market cap of 650.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while DGICB trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGICB's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to DGICB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to DGICB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs ACIC Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, ACIC has a market cap of 527.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while ACIC trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACIC's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ACIC's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to ACIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs GBLI Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, GBLI has a market cap of 458.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while GBLI trades at $30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLI's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GBLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to GBLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs UIHC Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, UIHC has a market cap of 343.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while UIHC trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UIHC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UIHC's ROE of +1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to UIHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AII Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AII has a market cap of 342.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AII trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AII's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AII's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs NODK Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, NODK has a market cap of 275.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while NODK trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NODK's P/E ratio is 45.97. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NODK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to NODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs CNFRZ Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, CNFRZ has a market cap of 243.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while CNFRZ trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CNFRZ's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CNFRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs KINS Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, KINS has a market cap of 223M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while KINS trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KINS's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KINS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to KINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs CNFR Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, CNFR has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while CNFR trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNFR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CNFR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to CNFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs UNAM Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, UNAM has a market cap of 430.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while UNAM trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNAM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to UNAM's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to UNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs HALL Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, HALL has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while HALL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HALL's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to HALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs ARGO-PA Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, ARGO-PA has a market cap of 328. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while ARGO-PA trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARGO-PA's P/E ratio is -25.17. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARGO-PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to ARGO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs FNHC Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, FNHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while FNHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNHC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FNHC's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to FNHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AHL-PC Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AHL-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AHL-PC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AHL-PC's P/E ratio is -102.92. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AHL-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to AHL-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs MILE Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, MILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while MILE trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILE's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MILE's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to MILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs AFHBL Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, AFHBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while AFHBL trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFHBL's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AFHBL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to AFHBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs Y Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, Y has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while Y trades at $847.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Y's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to Y's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to Y. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs STFC Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, STFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while STFC trades at $52.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STFC's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STFC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to STFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs MILEW Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, MILEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while MILEW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MILEW's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is less volatile compared to MILEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.
WRB-PF vs NSEC Comparison
WRB-PF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WRB-PF stands at 26B. In comparison, NSEC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WRB-PF is priced at $19.71, while NSEC trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WRB-PF currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSEC's P/E ratio is 51.13. In terms of profitability, WRB-PF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NSEC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WRB-PF is more volatile compared to NSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WRB-PF.