TeraWulf Inc.
TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WULF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Capital Markets Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WULF | $5.32 | +2.31% | 2B | -15.65 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| MS | $142.50 | +0.20% | 227.7B | 16.13 | $8.83 | +2.59% |
| MS-PA | $21.76 | +0.00% | 227.5B | 2.77 | $7.86 | +2.59% |
| MS-PE | $25.45 | -0.16% | 227.1B | 3.24 | $7.86 | +2.59% |
| MS-PF | $25.20 | -0.20% | 226.8B | 3.21 | $7.86 | +2.59% |
| MS-PK | $23.86 | -0.38% | 226.6B | 3.04 | $7.86 | +2.59% |
| MS-PI | $24.93 | -0.52% | 226B | 3.17 | $7.86 | +2.59% |
| GS | $719.18 | +0.23% | 220.7B | 15.84 | $45.42 | +1.66% |
| GS-PA | $22.00 | -0.18% | 220.2B | 0.43 | $51.53 | +1.66% |
| GS-PD | $21.49 | -0.14% | 219.9B | 0.42 | $51.53 | +1.66% |
Stock Comparison
WULF vs MS Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MS has a market cap of 227.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MS trades at $142.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MS's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS's competition here
WULF vs MS-PA Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MS-PA has a market cap of 227.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MS-PA trades at $21.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MS-PA's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MS-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PA's competition here
WULF vs MS-PE Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MS-PE has a market cap of 227.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MS-PE trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MS-PE's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MS-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PE's competition here
WULF vs MS-PF Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MS-PF has a market cap of 226.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MS-PF trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MS-PF's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MS-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PF's competition here
WULF vs MS-PK Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MS-PK has a market cap of 226.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MS-PK trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MS-PK's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MS-PK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PK's competition here
WULF vs MS-PI Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MS-PI has a market cap of 226B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MS-PI trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MS-PI's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MS-PI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PI's competition here
WULF vs GS Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GS has a market cap of 220.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GS trades at $719.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GS's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS's competition here
WULF vs GS-PA Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GS-PA has a market cap of 220.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GS-PA trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GS-PA's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GS-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS-PA's competition here
WULF vs GS-PD Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GS-PD has a market cap of 219.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GS-PD trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GS-PD's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GS-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS-PD's competition here
WULF vs GS-PC Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GS-PC has a market cap of 219.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GS-PC trades at $21.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GS-PC's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GS-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS-PC's competition here
WULF vs SCHW Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SCHW has a market cap of 175.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SCHW trades at $96.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SCHW's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SCHW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SCHW's competition here
WULF vs SCHW-PD Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SCHW-PD has a market cap of 172.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SCHW-PD trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SCHW-PD's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SCHW-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SCHW-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SCHW-PD's competition here
WULF vs GS-PJ Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GS-PJ has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GS-PJ trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GS-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GS-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS-PJ's competition here
WULF vs GS-PK Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GS-PK has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GS-PK trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GS-PK's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GS-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GS-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GS-PK's competition here
WULF vs MS-PP Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MS-PP has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MS-PP trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MS-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MS-PP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PP's competition here
WULF vs MS-PQ Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MS-PQ has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MS-PQ trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MS-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MS-PQ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PQ's competition here
WULF vs SCHW-PJ Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SCHW-PJ has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SCHW-PJ trades at $19.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SCHW-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SCHW-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SCHW-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SCHW-PJ's competition here
WULF vs RJF Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, RJF has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while RJF trades at $166.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas RJF's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to RJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check RJF's competition here
WULF vs TW Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, TW has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while TW trades at $138.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas TW's P/E ratio is 56.98. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to TW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check TW's competition here
WULF vs MS-PL Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MS-PL has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MS-PL trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MS-PL's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MS-PL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PL's competition here
WULF vs LPLA Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, LPLA has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while LPLA trades at $376.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas LPLA's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LPLA's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to LPLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check LPLA's competition here
WULF vs IBKR Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, IBKR has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while IBKR trades at $64.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas IBKR's P/E ratio is 33.62. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IBKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to IBKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check IBKR's competition here
WULF vs MS-PO Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MS-PO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MS-PO trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MS-PO's P/E ratio is 2.21. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MS-PO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MS-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MS-PO's competition here
WULF vs NMR Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, NMR has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while NMR trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas NMR's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to NMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check NMR's competition here
WULF vs HLI Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, HLI has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while HLI trades at $197.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas HLI's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HLI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to HLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check HLI's competition here
WULF vs JEF Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, JEF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while JEF trades at $57.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas JEF's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to JEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to JEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check JEF's competition here
WULF vs EVR Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, EVR has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while EVR trades at $300.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas EVR's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EVR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to EVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check EVR's competition here
WULF vs SF Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SF trades at $111.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SF's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SF's competition here
WULF vs SF-PB Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SF-PB has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SF-PB trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SF-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SF-PB's competition here
WULF vs FRHC Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, FRHC has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while FRHC trades at $170.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas FRHC's P/E ratio is 121.89. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FRHC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FRHC's competition here
WULF vs SCE-PJ Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SCE-PJ has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SCE-PJ trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SCE-PJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SCE-PJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SCE-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SCE-PJ's competition here
WULF vs XP Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, XP has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while XP trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas XP's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to XP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to XP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check XP's competition here
WULF vs MKTX Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MKTX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MKTX trades at $213.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MKTX's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MKTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MKTX's competition here
WULF vs VIRT Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, VIRT has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while VIRT trades at $43.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas VIRT's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VIRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to VIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check VIRT's competition here
WULF vs MARA Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MARA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MARA trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MARA's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MARA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MARA's competition here
WULF vs PIPR Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, PIPR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while PIPR trades at $314.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas PIPR's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PIPR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PIPR's competition here
WULF vs RJF-PA Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, RJF-PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while RJF-PA trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas RJF-PA's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RJF-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to RJF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check RJF-PA's competition here
WULF vs MC Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MC trades at $71.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MC's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MC's competition here
WULF vs LAZ Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, LAZ has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while LAZ trades at $54.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas LAZ's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LAZ's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to LAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check LAZ's competition here
WULF vs RJF-PB Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, RJF-PB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while RJF-PB trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas RJF-PB's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RJF-PB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to RJF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check RJF-PB's competition here
WULF vs BGC Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, BGC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while BGC trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas BGC's P/E ratio is 38.38. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BGC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BGC's competition here
WULF vs SNEX Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SNEX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SNEX trades at $94.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SNEX's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SNEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SNEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SNEX's competition here
WULF vs PJT Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, PJT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while PJT trades at $186.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas PJT's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PJT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PJT's competition here
WULF vs IREN Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, IREN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while IREN trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas IREN's P/E ratio is -58.52. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to IREN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to IREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check IREN's competition here
WULF vs FUTU Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, FUTU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while FUTU trades at $166.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas FUTU's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FUTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FUTU's competition here
WULF vs MRX Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MRX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MRX trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MRX's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MRX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to MRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MRX's competition here
WULF vs CIFRW Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, CIFRW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while CIFRW trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas CIFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CIFRW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to CIFRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CIFRW's competition here
WULF vs HUT Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, HUT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while HUT trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas HUT's P/E ratio is -32.03. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HUT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to HUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check HUT's competition here
WULF vs SF-PC Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SF-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SF-PC trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SF-PC's P/E ratio is 3.52. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SF-PC's competition here
WULF vs CIFR Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, CIFR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while CIFR trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas CIFR's P/E ratio is -17.47. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CIFR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to CIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CIFR's competition here
WULF vs PWP Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, PWP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while PWP trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas PWP's P/E ratio is -99.10. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PWP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PWP's competition here
WULF vs TIGR Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, TIGR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while TIGR trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas TIGR's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TIGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to TIGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check TIGR's competition here
WULF vs SF-PD Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SF-PD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SF-PD trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SF-PD's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SF-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SF-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SF-PD's competition here
WULF vs DFIN Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, DFIN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while DFIN trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas DFIN's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to DFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to DFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check DFIN's competition here
WULF vs BGCP Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, BGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while BGCP trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas BGCP's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BGCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to BGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BGCP's competition here
WULF vs HKIB Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, HKIB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while HKIB trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas HKIB's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HKIB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to HKIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check HKIB's competition here
WULF vs COWN Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, COWN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while COWN trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas COWN's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to COWN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to COWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check COWN's competition here
WULF vs BTBT Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, BTBT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while BTBT trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas BTBT's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BTBT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to BTBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BTBT's competition here
WULF vs AC Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, AC has a market cap of 784.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while AC trades at $37.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas AC's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to AC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check AC's competition here
WULF vs OPY Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, OPY has a market cap of 758.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while OPY trades at $72.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas OPY's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to OPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to OPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check OPY's competition here
WULF vs BITF Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, BITF has a market cap of 683.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while BITF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas BITF's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BITF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to BITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BITF's competition here
WULF vs FUFU Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, FUFU has a market cap of 654.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while FUFU trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas FUFU's P/E ratio is 401.00. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FUFU's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to FUFU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FUFU's competition here
WULF vs FUFUW Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, FUFUW has a market cap of 633.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while FUFUW trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas FUFUW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FUFUW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to FUFUW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check FUFUW's competition here
WULF vs AMRK Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, AMRK has a market cap of 538.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while AMRK trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas AMRK's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to AMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check AMRK's competition here
WULF vs HIVE Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, HIVE has a market cap of 503.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while HIVE trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas HIVE's P/E ratio is -117.50. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HIVE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to HIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check HIVE's competition here
WULF vs COHN Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, COHN has a market cap of 330.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while COHN trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas COHN's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to COHN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to COHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check COHN's competition here
WULF vs GHL Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GHL has a market cap of 282M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GHL trades at $14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GHL's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GHL's competition here
WULF vs SWIN Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SWIN has a market cap of 207.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SWIN trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SWIN's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SWIN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to SWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SWIN's competition here
WULF vs MFH Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MFH has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MFH trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MFH's P/E ratio is -38.37. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MFH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to MFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MFH's competition here
WULF vs SIEB Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SIEB has a market cap of 172.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SIEB trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SIEB's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SIEB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to SIEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SIEB's competition here
WULF vs WHG Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, WHG has a market cap of 169.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while WHG trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas WHG's P/E ratio is 451.00. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to WHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check WHG's competition here
WULF vs PROP Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, PROP has a market cap of 167.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while PROP trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas PROP's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PROP's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to PROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PROP's competition here
WULF vs BTCS Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, BTCS has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while BTCS trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas BTCS's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BTCS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to BTCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BTCS's competition here
WULF vs BTM Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, BTM has a market cap of 121.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while BTM trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas BTM's P/E ratio is -35.07. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BTM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to BTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check BTM's competition here
WULF vs CLSKW Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, CLSKW has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while CLSKW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas CLSKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CLSKW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to CLSKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check CLSKW's competition here
WULF vs TCJH Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, TCJH has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while TCJH trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas TCJH's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TCJH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to TCJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check TCJH's competition here
WULF vs SRL Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SRL has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SRL trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SRL's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SRL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SRL's competition here
WULF vs GRYP Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GRYP has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GRYP trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GRYP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GRYP's ROE of +1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to GRYP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GRYP's competition here
WULF vs HGBL Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, HGBL has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while HGBL trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas HGBL's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HGBL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to HGBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check HGBL's competition here
WULF vs GRDI Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GRDI has a market cap of 68.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GRDI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GRDI's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GRDI's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to GRDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GRDI's competition here
WULF vs PLUT Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, PLUT has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while PLUT trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas PLUT's P/E ratio is -60.20. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to PLUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to PLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check PLUT's competition here
WULF vs TOP Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, TOP has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while TOP trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas TOP's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TOP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to TOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check TOP's competition here
WULF vs MDBH Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MDBH has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MDBH trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MDBH's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MDBH's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to MDBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MDBH's competition here
WULF vs SDIG Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SDIG has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SDIG trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SDIG's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SDIG's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SDIG's competition here
WULF vs GREE Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GREE has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GREE trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GREE's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GREE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to GREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GREE's competition here
WULF vs ARBK Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, ARBK has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while ARBK trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas ARBK's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ARBK's ROE of +3.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to ARBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ARBK's competition here
WULF vs SAI Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SAI has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SAI trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SAI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SAI's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to SAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SAI's competition here
WULF vs MEGL Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MEGL has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MEGL trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MEGL's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MEGL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to MEGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MEGL's competition here
WULF vs NCPL Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, NCPL has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while NCPL trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas NCPL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NCPL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to NCPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check NCPL's competition here
WULF vs NCPLW Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, NCPLW has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while NCPLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas NCPLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NCPLW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to NCPLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check NCPLW's competition here
WULF vs ABTS Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, ABTS has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while ABTS trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas ABTS's P/E ratio is -12.34. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ABTS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to ABTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ABTS's competition here
WULF vs MIGI Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, MIGI has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while MIGI trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas MIGI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to MIGI's ROE of +58.60%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to MIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check MIGI's competition here
WULF vs ATIF Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, ATIF has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while ATIF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas ATIF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ATIF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to ATIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check ATIF's competition here
WULF vs WAI Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, WAI has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while WAI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas WAI's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to WAI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to WAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check WAI's competition here
WULF vs GSIW Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GSIW has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GSIW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GSIW's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GSIW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to GSIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GSIW's competition here
WULF vs LGHLW Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, LGHLW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while LGHLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas LGHLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LGHLW's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to LGHLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check LGHLW's competition here
WULF vs GRDIW Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, GRDIW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while GRDIW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas GRDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GRDIW's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to GRDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check GRDIW's competition here
WULF vs SAITW Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, SAITW has a market cap of 964.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while SAITW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas SAITW's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SAITW's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is more volatile compared to SAITW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check SAITW's competition here
WULF vs LGHL Comparison July 2025
WULF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WULF stands at 2B. In comparison, LGHL has a market cap of 298.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WULF is priced at $5.32, while LGHL trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WULF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.65, whereas LGHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, WULF's ROE is -0.42%, compared to LGHL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WULF is less volatile compared to LGHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WULF.Check LGHL's competition here