Exxon Mobil Corporation
Exxon Mobil Corporation XOM Peers
See (XOM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | $109.38 | -0.55% | 471.2B | 14.50 | $7.54 | +3.59% |
| CVX | $143.79 | -0.45% | 251.1B | 16.41 | $8.76 | +4.66% |
| SHEL | $70.98 | -0.01% | 214.9B | 16.20 | $4.38 | +3.96% |
| TTE | $61.50 | -0.10% | 137.2B | 10.30 | $5.97 | +5.29% |
| BP | $30.34 | +0.17% | 78.8B | -73.95 | -$0.41 | +6.28% |
| PBR | $12.38 | -0.60% | 76.8B | 9.24 | $1.34 | +14.39% |
| PBR-A | $11.39 | -0.26% | 74.7B | 8.51 | $1.34 | +16.68% |
| EQNR | $25.11 | -0.30% | 68.6B | 7.94 | $3.16 | +9.40% |
| E | $32.49 | +1.03% | 49.3B | 18.15 | $1.79 | +7.04% |
| SU | $37.59 | -1.00% | 46.1B | 10.64 | $3.53 | +4.32% |
Stock Comparison
XOM vs CVX Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 251.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while CVX trades at $143.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs SHEL Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 214.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while SHEL trades at $70.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs TTE Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 137.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while TTE trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs BP Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while BP trades at $30.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -73.95. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs PBR Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 76.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while PBR trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs PBR-A Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while PBR-A trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs EQNR Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while EQNR trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs E Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while E trades at $32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas E's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs SU Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while SU trades at $37.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs IMO Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while IMO trades at $79.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs CVE Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while CVE trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs EC Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while EC trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs YPF Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while YPF trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs NFG Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while NFG trades at $84.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 184.76. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs TGS Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while TGS trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs TANNZ Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs SLNG Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while SLNG trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 60.50. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs CGBS Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while CGBS trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs SKYQ Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while SKYQ trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs ZEST Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs RDS-B Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs TELZ Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs SNP Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs PTR Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.
XOM vs RDS-A Comparison
XOM plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOM stands at 471.2B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOM is priced at $109.38, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOM currently has a P/E ratio of 14.50, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, XOM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOM is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOM.